JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 5, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Pedro Antonio Herrera Miranda

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de reposición en contra de la Sentencia C-293/20.

Luego de analizar los argumentos del memorialista, la Corte concluye que la impugnación es manifiestamente improcedente, con fundamento en los artículos 49 del Decreto 2067 de 1991 y 285 y 318 del Código General del Proceso.

Precisa la Sala, que contra las sentencias proferidas por la Corporación no procede recurso alguno y que el recurrente carece de legitimación por activa, puesto que no intervino en el trámite constitucional que concluyó con la mencionada providencia.

Con fundamento en lo anterior se RECHAZA el incidente analizado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por manifiestamente improcedente el recurso de reposicion presentado por Pedro Antonio Herrera Miranda contra la Sentencia C-293 del 5 de agosto de 2020.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General de esta Corporacion,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.